“CPs” 和 “CSs” 在法律术语中通常指的是 “条件先决”（Conditions Precedent）和 “条件随后”（Conditions Subsequent）。这些术语经常在合同法中使用，尤其是在商业和金融交易中。 这两种类型的条件对于确保合同各方履行其义务和保护他们的利益非常重要。 以下是一些关于条件先决（CPs）和条件随后（CSs）的示范条款，这些条款通常在各种类型的合同中出现： 条件先决（CPs）示范条款 条件随后（CSs）示范条款 这些条款仅作为示例，实际的法律文本可能会根据具体情况和法律要求有所不同。
Sam 致公司的讯息 2023年11月30日 (全文) 我将重返 OpenAI，担任首席执行官。米拉将重新担任首席技术官。新的初始董事会将由 Bret Taylor（主席）、Larry Summers 和 Adam D’Angelo 组成。 我对未来从未如此兴奋。我非常感谢每个人在不明朗和前所未有的情况下所做的辛勤工作，我相信我们的韧性和精神使我们在行业中脱颖而出。我对我们成功实现使命的可能性感到非常非常满意。 在开始接下来的内容之前，我想先表达一些谢意。 我爱并尊重伊利亚，我认为他是这个领域的指路明灯，也是人类的瑰宝。我对他的恶意为零。虽然 Ilya 将不再担任董事会成员，但我们希望继续我们的工作关系，并正在讨论他如何继续在 OpenAI 的工作。 我感谢 Adam、Tasha 和 Helen 与我们合作，找到了最能服务于使命的解决方案。我很高兴继续与 Adam 合作，并真诚地感谢 Helen 和 Tasha 在此过程中投入了大量的精力。 还要感谢埃米特，他在帮助我们实现这一成果方面发挥了关键和建设性的作用。 Emmett 对人工智能安全和平衡利益相关者利益的奉献是显而易见的。 米拉在整个过程中表现出色，自始至终无私地为使命、团队和公司服务。她是一位令人难以置信的领导者，如果没有她，OpenAI 就不会成为 OpenAI。谢谢。 格雷格和我是经营这家公司的合伙人。我们从未完全弄清楚如何在组织结构图上传达这一点，但我们会的。与此同时，我只是想澄清一下。感谢你们从一开始以来所做的一切，以及从这件事开始到上周你们处理事情的方式。 领导团队——Mira、Brad、Jason、Che、Hannah、Diane、Anna、Bob、Srinivas、Matt、Lilian、Miles、Jan、Wojciech、John、Jonathan、Pat 等——显然已准备好在没有任何情况下运营公司。我。他们说，评估首席执行官的一种方法是看你如何挑选和培训你的潜在继任者；在这个指标上，我做得比我想象的要好得多。我很清楚，公司掌握在伟大的人手中，我希望每个人都清楚这一点。谢谢你们。 Jakub、Szymon 和 Aleksander 都是杰出的人才，我很高兴他们重新加入，推动我们和我们的研究向前发展。谢谢。 对我们团队的所有人：我相信将会有关于这个时期的书籍被写出来，我希望他们说的第一句话就是整个团队是多么的令人惊叹。现在我们经历了这一切，我们没有失去任何一名员工。你们坚定地支持彼此、这家公司和我们的使命。对于安全构建 AGI 的团队来说，最重要的事情之一就是能够处理有压力和不确定的情况，并始终保持良好的判断力。最高分。谢谢你们。 萨蒂亚、凯文、艾米和布拉德在整个过程中一直是令人难以置信的合作伙伴，自始至终都有着正确的优先事项。如果我们无法实现我们的主要目标，他们会支持我们并准备好欢迎我们所有人。我们显然做出了与微软合作的正确选择，我很高兴我们的新董事会将他们作为无投票权的观察员。谢谢。 对于我们的合作伙伴和用户，感谢您坚持使用我们。我们确实感受到了倾注的支持和爱，它帮助我们所有人度过了难关。我们没有失去任何一个客户，这一事实将促使我们更加努力地为您服务，我们都很高兴能够重返工作岗位。 威尔·赫德、布莱恩·切斯基、布雷特·泰勒和拉里·萨默斯搁置了自己的生活，为支持这项任务做出了令人难以置信的努力。我不知道他们是如何做得这么好，但他们确实做到了。谢谢。 除了提供一如既往的无条件的爱和支持之外，奥利还一直搁置自己的生活，尽其所能提供帮助。谢谢你，我爱你。 So what’s next? 下一个是什么？ 我们有三个当务之急。 推进我们的研究计划并进一步投资于我们的全栈安全工作，这对我们的工作一直至关重要。我们的研究路线图很明确；这是一个非常专注的时刻。我和你们一样感到兴奋；我们将化危机为机遇！我将与米拉一起解决这个问题。 持续改进和部署我们的产品并服务我们的客户。重要的是，人们要体验人工智能的好处和前景，并有机会塑造它。我们始终相信，优秀的产品是实现这一目标的最佳方式。我将与 Brad、Jason 和 Anna 合作，确保我们对世界各地的用户、客户、合作伙伴和政府的坚定承诺是明确的。 布雷特、拉里和亚当将非常努力地完成一项极其重要的任务，即建立一个具有不同观点的董事会、改善我们的治理结构以及监督对最近事件的独立审查。我期待在这些关键步骤上与他们密切合作，以便每个人都能对 OpenAI 的稳定性充满信心。 我非常期待与你们一起完成构建有益的 AGI 的工作——世界上最好的团队，世界上最好的使命。 Love Sam
The SRA Code of Conduct for Firms outlines the standards and business controls expected by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the public. In relation to compliance officers, the Code sets out specific obligations and responsibilities that they must fulfill. Here are some key points related to compliance officers within the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms: 1. Appointment and Role: Firms are required to appoint and maintain compliance officers who have the competence, authority, and resources to discharge their role effectively. Compliance officers are responsible for overseeing and monitoring compliance with the SRA Standards and Regulations within the firm. 2. Compliance Policies and Procedures: Compliance officers should ensure that the firm has appropriate policies, procedures, and systems in place to achieve and maintain compliance. These may include risk management policies, anti-money laundering procedures, data protection measures, and other relevant policies specific to the firm’s practice. 3. Training and Oversight: Compliance officers should provide training and guidance to all employees within the firm regarding their obligations under the SRA Standards and Regulations. They should also implement mechanisms to monitor and ensure ongoing compliance with these standards and regulations. 4. Reporting and Record-Keeping: Compliance officers play a crucial role in promptly reporting to the SRA any serious breaches or failures to comply with the SRA Standards and Regulations. They should maintain appropriate records to demonstrate compliance and make such records available to the SRA upon request. 5. Independence and Autonomy: Compliance officers should have sufficient independence and autonomy to carry out their responsibilities effectively. They should have direct access to the firm’s management and be able to report independently on compliance matters. 6. Continuing Professional Development: Compliance officers should undertake regular training and development to maintain and enhance their knowledge of regulatory requirements and best ……
The SRA Code of Conduct for Firms regulates the conduct of law firms, including sole practices. It sets out the standards and business controls expected by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the public. The Code applies to managers in authorised firms and compliance officers. In relation to managers in authorised firms, the Code contains provisions that managers must adhere to. These provisions include: – Maintaining trust and acting fairly: Managers must ensure that their personal views do not unfairly discriminate and affect their professional relationships and the provision of services. – Avoiding abuse of position: Managers should not abuse their position of power within the firm to gain undue advantage or exploit others. – Avoiding misleading others: Managers must not provide false or misleading information to clients, employees, or other parties. – Fulfilling undertakings: Managers must honor any commitments or agreements made on behalf of the firm and ensure that they are fulfilled. – Dispute resolution and proceedings: Managers should ensure that the firm complies with the standards set for resolving disputes and participating in legal proceedings before courts, tribunals, and inquiries. Breach of the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms by managers in authorised firms may lead to regulatory actions against the firm itself, its managers, or compliance officers, as well as against employees within the firm. It is important for managers to familiarize themselves with the specific requirements and obligations outlined in the Code to ensure compliance and uphold professional standards.
The SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs (Registered European Lawyers), and RFLs (Registered Foreign Lawyers) regulates the conduct of these individuals and sets out the standards of professionalism expected by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the public. This code describes the ethical behavior and responsibilities that solicitors, RELs, and RFLs must adhere to in their professional practice. It covers various aspects such as maintaining trust and acting fairly, avoiding discrimination, avoiding abuse of position, avoiding misleading others, and fulfilling undertakings. The code also outlines the standards and controls expected in relation to dispute resolution and proceedings before courts, tribunals, and inquiries.
The SRA Principles consist of seven mandatory principles that solicitors must adhere to in their ethical and professional conduct. These principles serve as guidelines to ensure the proper administration of justice and maintain public trust in the solicitors’ profession. Let’s explore the purpose, scope, and content of these principles: 1. Upholding the Rule of Law and Proper Administration of Justice: – Solicitors must act in a way that upholds the rule of law and ensures the proper administration of justice. 2. Upholding Public Trust in the Solicitors’ Profession: – Solicitors must act in a way that avoids dishonesty and the commission of criminal offenses, both in their professional and private life, to maintain public trust in the profession. 3. Acting with Independence: – Solicitors must make decisions independently and should not put themselves in a position where decisions are made by someone other than themselves or their clients. They should be free to make independent decisions regarding their clients’ interests. 4. Acting with Honesty: – Solicitors must be honest in their dealings with clients, opponents, and judges. They may not lie or deceive others in the course of their professional duties. 5. Acting with Integrity: – Solicitors must exhibit integrity in their professional conduct. They should not take unfair advantage of unrepresented opponents’ lack of legal knowledge and must maintain ethical standards even in their personal lives. 6. Encouraging Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion: – Solicitors should promote equality, diversity, and inclusion within their profession. They should not discriminate in hiring based on sex, race, national origin, age, or any other factors. 7. Acting in the Best Interests of Each Client: – Solicitors must act in the best interests of ……
Based on the information provided in the Source, the application of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) and related secondary legislation to the work of a solicitor can be summarized as follows: 1. General Prohibition: Under the FSMA, solicitors are generally prohibited from carrying on regulated activities as defined in the Act. Regulated activities are specified activities related to specified investments, as identified in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001. 2. Generic Mortgage Advice: Solicitors are permitted to provide generic advice regarding mortgages. This means they can describe different types of mortgages to clients but cannot assist them in choosing one mortgage offer over another. 3. Conflicts of Interest: A solicitor’s duty to act in the best interests of their clients places limitations on taking instructions in the presence of conflicts of interest. There are two types of conflicts: own interest conflicts and client conflicts. a. Own Interest Conflicts: These arise when there is a conflict of interest between the solicitor (or the firm) and the client. Situations including the solicitor having a financial interest in the client’s transaction, the client’s claim against someone related to the solicitor, the client’s claim against a company with which the solicitor has a commercial relationship, or the client seeking advice on rectifying losses caused by the solicitor’s mistake can all create an own interest conflict. b. Client Conflicts: These arise when there is a conflict of interest between two or more clients. The solicitor must be cautious about representing clients who have conflicting interests. 4. Risk of Conflict: The duty to avoid conflicts of interest applies not only when there is an actual conflict but also when there is a significant risk of conflict. 5. Prohibition on ……
闫鹏和律师（Harvey YAN），中银律所总所高级合伙人，毕业于北京大学法学院，获法学硕士学位，并曾就读于“北大全球高端法商人才计划”，先后在伦敦LSE和Imperial读完并购与经济课程。闫鹏和律师荣膺“2022 品牌影响力·十大领军人物”，律新社“2022 年度卓越管理影响力人物”奖项，第十七届中国并购年会授予闫鹏和律师“最佳并购律师”等荣誉称号……
闫鹏和律师不仅精通国内外投资并购法律政策和实务技能，而且拥有杰出的商业智慧和经济头脑，兼有深厚资源和全球视野，服务过众多知名客户和有影响力的大型项目，擅长处理综合性疑难交易和重大复杂案件，拥有十分良好的口碑和信誉，是深受欢迎的法商融合专家型律师。
